Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Today’s topic and photo are courtesy of Travis, a student in the SCAD writing department. He discovered this sign on a printer in the Jen Library. Some students say it has been there for a couple of weeks.

Here’s my beef with this sign: the word “utilize.” What did the word “use” ever do to anyone? “Utilize” is like pearls on a pig. Pointless. “Use” is a fine word; there is nothing wrong with it. That’ll do, Pig. That’ll do.

And don’t get me started on “supersize” as a verb. Damn you, McDonald’s.

Trish gets demanding

I realized that Trish had not made an appearance in a while. And this blog IS supposed to be about grammar and chickens. So here it is, Trish’s latest escapade:

The cookie container is what we use to hold her feed. And that is why she is perched above and eyeing it.

A “Hoarders” let-down

I love the show “Hoarders.” I hate the written chunks between segments. Not only are they unnecessary recaps, but they usually feature passive voice. I hate passive voice.

On the last episode, I was shocked to discover something I hate even more: an egregious error. Take a look:

"Hoarders" error

Despite how people may want this to work, and expect it to work, the possessive form of “it” is “its.” No apostrophe. “It’s” is always a contraction for “it is” or “it has.” Those are the rules.

To the “Hoarders” production crew, I say, “Please stop hoarding apostrophes.”

“I” vs. “me” AGAIN

I’m not happy with the copy editor of today’s issue of the Savannah Morning News. In addition to allowing Arlinda Smith Broady to get away with using an ampersand in SCAD’s name on the front page of Exchange, the editor allowed an improper use of “I” on the front page of Accent. In a short about her new column, Christine Lucas wrote, “It’s just that he’s got my husband and I a little bit Rattled.” I’ll overlook the random capitalization because that could be a typo. The use of “I” however is ignorance. She shouldn’t have written it, but the copy editor should have caught it.

I don’t understand why this is so hard. As I explained in an earlier post, “I” is a subject pronoun and “me” is an object pronoun.

If you are doing something to someone or something, use “I” because you are the subject. If something is being done to you, use “me” because you are the object.

People incorrectly use “I” all the time. Why is “me” so frightening?

Eddie can’t stand watching television with me sometimes because I will mutter the correct version. And then sigh loudly.

So let’s go over it again. Here are some examples: Eddie and I are watching television. Dominic and Gideon watched television with Eddie and me. I said, “Dominic, give the remote to your father and me.” Eddie said, “Gideon, you and I are going upstairs right now because you can’t sit still.”

When in doubt, leave it out. Then see if the sentence makes sense. So Christine Lucas’ sentence without the other person would be, “It’s just that he’s got my husband and I a little bit Rattled.” That’s certainly not right. So use “me” instead: “It’s just that he’s got my husband and I me a little bit Rattled.” THAT makes sense. So the sentence should read, “It’s just that he’s got my husband and me a little bit Rattled.”

Copy editors should know these kinds of things. Now all of you do too.

Broadway thread addendum

Perhaps I wasn’t clear in my last post. At least, I wasn’t clear enough for new people visiting my blog from the Broadway discussion board. And for that, I apologize.

As “jmi” points out: “She didn’t really say anything in the blog other than that her friend found this thread. What’s interesting about that? We all found this thread too. ;-)”

Yes, indeed.

Here is why I posted the link to the thread on my blog:

1. Because I love it when people have in-depth discussions about grammar, punctuation and style

2. Because “gusto” posted (with gusto) that he/she had the only correct answer (“These are the rules”), when he/she was quite wrong according to a number of stylebooks. My favorite, the AP Stylebook, allows only quotation marks for composition titles.

3. Because Shane Marshall Brown saw the thread and thought of me. I love that people think of me when they see language mistakes or language discussions.

So thank you, “jmi,” for reminding me of the importance of considering my audience.

Today’s post topic comes from my good friend Shane Marshall Brown. (He has one of those names where you just have to say the whole thing — like Jonathan Taylor Thomas, Anthony Michael Hall or Billy Bob Thornton. I’ve never referred to him as “Shane.” That would be weird.)

Anyway, he is a publicist for Broadway and off-Broadway shows, and discovered this thread about the show “ENRON.” My favorite part is the post where “gusto” asserts, “These are the rules.” It is a good thing “FleetStreetBarber” was there, or I would have had an AP canary all over that thread.

It is also a good thing I have this blog as a place to vent.

My eyes! My eyes!

I must thank Jacque, a student in the SCAD writing department, for providing the subject of tonight’s blog post. She reports that the image below was on the desktop of the college’s computers.

Ordinarily, I’d ask you to avert your eyes at such hideousness, but not tonight. Tonight I want you to look. Focus on it in all of its glory. And then let’s talk about it.

WHAT is going on here? Do people in these departments not know that there are people at SCAD who can help them write and design marketing materials? Is Montgomery Hal any relation to Shallow Hal? How many fonts are represented overall? And the colors! The colors! GAH!

Please make it stop.

Thanks to my friend Heidi, I am now wearing my mascara in a variety of places. She directed me to a site that has me weeping: http://engrishfunny.com/

Here is a sample of what you will see on this site:

Enjoy!

Update: Here is a similar site, courtesy of my friend Billy: http://engrish.com/

Academic rock star

I kept it together tonight. I did not throw my panties on the stage, or engage in any other unseemly fan behavior. I was, however, awestruck, and rendered speechless.

Stanley Fish spoke at SCAD.

The topic of his lecture was “How to Write a Sentence.” If you read his New York Times columns here (Part I) and here (Part II), you’ll get the gist of the lecture. Bottom line: Form is more important than content. People can express ideas and be creative only within the confines of syntax, and they must know syntax.

Now discuss among yourselves. I feel faint.

Need a Hen Pal?

Trish the Chicken now has her own Facebook page.

Trish updates her status

Trish is more technologically advanced than any chicken (and many people). Check her out: